Not every typography project demands novelty. Because these fonts are included with billions of computers, they’re used all the time. See the difference?Īll system fonts are overexposed. But Georgia was optimized for the screen Miller was optimized for print. In basic appearance, they’re similar. Screen-optimized fonts look clunky on the printed page.Ĭompare the two fonts above. This comes at the cost of design details, which have been sanded off because they don’t reproduce well on screen (e.g., Georgia, Verdana, Cambria, and Calibri). Many system fonts have been optimized for the screen, not print. In one square inch, an LCD screen that displays 100 dots per inch has less than 3% of the resolution of a laser printer with 600 dots per inch, so rendering a font accurately is much more difficult. I won’t name names, but my least favorite rhymes with Barial. The Windows and Mac OS libraries have improved, but they’re still minefields of awful fonts. In printed documents they present three problems. System fonts are the fonts already installed on your computer. System fonts Avoid if you can, choose wisely if you can’t
0 kommentar(er)
